Re: : Support for Geopriv RADIUS attributes in Diameter

I'd prefer the NASREQ approach.

--Jari

[email protected] wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I've gotten some queries, off-list, about how 3GPP should handle the location 
>AVPs that are defined in:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-02.txt
>
>3GPP has defined the Wa interface, which is based on Diameter, that will
>interwork with RADIUS and will carry the RADIUS AVPs.  Would standard
>NASREQ rules apply here (Diameter would just re-use the RADIUS codes), or
>should these AVPs also be defined in a seperate Diameter draft?
>
>The draft above is quite weak on how these attributes should be handled
>in Diameter, so I wanted to see what both the AAA WG and RADEXT WG 
>thought.
>
>John
>
>  
>