Hi Jari,
> I'd prefer the NASREQ approach.
I think that would be reasonable. Do you think that this should be written-up
anywhere? Should I try to supply some text for the geopriv draft?
John
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've gotten some queries, off-list, about how 3GPP should
> handle the location
> >AVPs that are defined in:
> >
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-radius
> -lo-02.txt
> >
> >3GPP has defined the Wa interface, which is based on
> Diameter, that will
> >interwork with RADIUS and will carry the RADIUS AVPs. Would standard
> >NASREQ rules apply here (Diameter would just re-use the
> RADIUS codes), or
> >should these AVPs also be defined in a seperate Diameter draft?
> >
> >The draft above is quite weak on how these attributes should
> be handled
> >in Diameter, so I wanted to see what both the AAA WG and RADEXT WG
> >thought.
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.