RE: : Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 4005 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-nasreq-17.txt>

Bernard Aboba <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.aaa
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
> One question: given that the method specified will admittedly not
> work in the general case and appears to violate the "SHOULD"
> referenced in RFC 2865, why are we prepared to enshrine it as a
> Proposed Standard?

Are you suggesting that the document be downgraded to Informational?  That
the SHOULD needs to be removed?  Or something else?  Please clarify.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.