RE: : Re: authors 48 hours: RFC 4005 <draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-nasreq-17.txt>
"Glen Zorn (gwz)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bernard Aboba <mailto:[email protected]> supposedly scribbled: >> One question: given that the method specified will admittedly not >> work in the general case and appears to violate the "SHOULD" >> referenced in RFC 2865, why are we prepared to enshrine it as a >> Proposed Standard? > > Are you suggesting that the document be downgraded to Informational? > That the SHOULD needs to be removed? From RFC 2865? > Or something else? I suggesting that we not knowingly publish a flawed document. I am suggesting that we publish a protocol that works. > Please clarify. Hope this helps, ~gwz Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by simply listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel