RE: : WGLC on Diameter SIP application -09

Hi all,

Please disregard the "Issue Number: Get_An_Issue_Number_From_Pat
Description 
of issue:".  That was a cut & paste error.

John

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: 04 October, 2005 12:49
>To: Garcia Miguel.An (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki); [email protected]
>Cc: [email protected]; 
>[email protected]; 
>[email protected]; Tammi Kalle (Nokia-NET/Tampere)
>Subject: [AAA-WG]: WGLC on Diameter SIP application -09
>
>The AAA Working Group chairs would like to make an 
>announcement of AAA WG last call
>on:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip
-app-09.t
>xt
>
>This draft is a Standards Track document. Please send comments 
>on this document to the AAA WG mailing list, on or before 
>September 24th, 2005.
>
>We are primarily interested in the text that has changed since 
>the last version was submitted.  For your convinience, below 
>are diffs from the previous versions, so you can easily 
>determine what has changed.  Note that Version 7 of the draft 
>was already WGLCed.
>
>Diff 08 to 09:
>http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-
>sip-app-0
>8-to-09.html
>
>Diff 07 to 09:
>http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-
>sip-app-0
>7-to-09.html
>
>As with other AAA WG documents, issues are to be submitted 
>using the following template:
>
>Issue Number: Get_An_Issue_Number_From_Pat Description of issue:
>Submitter name: Your_Name_Here
>Date first submitted: Insert_Date_Here
>Reference: URL to e-mail describing problem, if available
>Document: Document Requiring change [CCA] Comment type: 
>['T'echnical | 'E'ditorial ]
>Priority: ['S' Must fix | '1' Should fix | '2' May fix ]
>Section: Insert_Section_Number_Here
>Rationale/Explanation of issues: 
>
>Description_of_Problem_Goes_Here
>
>Requested change: 
>
>Proposal_Goes_Here_With_Specific_Text
>
>As with all working group last calls, the draft will be 
>updated according to working group consensus on issues submitted.  
>
>thanks, 
>Bernard, Dave &  John	
>