RE: : WGLC on Diameter SIP application -09

Given that the document has been through _two_ separate WG
"last" calls already (July-August 2004 and February-March 2005), 
and will still go through IETF last call, this sounds 
like overdoing the process to me.

And we still have the Author's 48 hour^H^H^H^Hweeks period
left, when anyone can request rewriting the document as long
as he or she uses the word "issue" :-)

Let's ship this document & kill the AAA WG for good...

Best regards,
Pasi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 04 October, 2005 12:49
> To: Garcia Miguel.An (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki); [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; Tammi Kalle (Nokia-NET/Tampere)
> Subject: [AAA-WG]: WGLC on Diameter SIP application -09
> 
> The AAA Working Group chairs would like to make an announcement of AAA
> WG last call 
> on:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-si
p-app-09.t
> xt
> 
> This draft is a Standards Track document. Please send comments on this
> document to the AAA WG mailing list, on or before September 
> 24th, 2005.
> 
> We are primarily interested in the text that has changed 
> since the last
> version
> was submitted.  For your convinience, below are diffs from 
> the previous
> versions,
> so you can easily determine what has changed.  Note that Version 7 of
> the draft
> was already WGLCed.
> 
> Diff 08 to 09:
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter
-sip-app-0
> 8-to-09.html
> 
> Diff 07 to 09:
> http://people.nokia.net/~miguel/drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter
-sip-app-0
> 7-to-09.html
> 
> As with other AAA WG documents, issues are to be submitted using the
> following template:
> 
> Issue Number: Get_An_Issue_Number_From_Pat
> Description of issue:
> Submitter name: Your_Name_Here
> Date first submitted: Insert_Date_Here
> Reference: URL to e-mail describing problem, if available
> Document: Document Requiring change [CCA]
> Comment type: ['T'echnical | 'E'ditorial ]
> Priority: ['S' Must fix | '1' Should fix | '2' May fix ]
> Section: Insert_Section_Number_Here
> Rationale/Explanation of issues: 
> 
> Description_of_Problem_Goes_Here
> 
> Requested change: 
> 
> Proposal_Goes_Here_With_Specific_Text
> 
> As with all working group last calls, the draft will be updated
> according
> to working group consensus on issues submitted.  
> 
> thanks, 
> Bernard, Dave &  John	
>