RE: : ISSUE, SIP, authentication parameters

Hi David,

>> Chair-hat off, I've always thought that WG consensus is needed to 
>> accept an issue; not to reject it.  YMMV.
>
>Hmmm.  I would personally be uncomfortable if the statement were
>reversed: "An issue may be rejected by the document editor 
>even though there is WG consensus to accept it."

That of course, is true.

>In my way of thinking acceptance and rejection are simply the 
>two values of a single Boolean object, and therefore symmetric.  :-)

My logic is:

 Accept issue if WG consensus supports issue.

John