RE: : How to proceed for the next Diameter Applications ?

Hi Glen

>> There have been discussions to start a Diameter Maintenance WG to 
>> handle this.
>
>Even though I understand that the IESG is allergic to protocol 
>extension (matching their aversion to extensible protocols ;-) 
>and portions of Diameter certainly need maintenance (for 
>example, RFCs 4072 & 4005), it certainly seems that new 
>applications, at least, fall firmly into that category (rather 
>than maintenance), don't you?

I agree.  The discussions have been whether to call it Diameter
Maintenance, Diameter Extensions or Diameter Maintenance &
Extensions ... YMMV.

John