Re: : ISSUE: SIP-User-Data AVP is mandatory in PPR

Miguel Garcia <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:27:09 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.aaa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well, in that case I will recommend that you review the issues one by 
one, those that you can/know/are-willing-to review. Then you file a 
separate report for each one, clearly indicating the divergence and the 
motivation for that divergence and a possible resolution when that 
affects only the Diameter SIP app (we don't consider the Cx interface here).

/Miguel

German Blanco (E2/EEM) wrote:

> Thanks.
> 
> I still think that it would be better if all the remaining differences
> are checked with the objective of having just one Diameter application
> definition.  That seems to be technically an easy thing to do, but 
> most likely a procedural nightmare (because it could mean e.g. changes 
> both in Cx and the draft and an agreement in 3GPP to adopt the RFC 
> before the approval).
> Anyway, not knowing how bad that could get, I personally think it is 
> worth trying.  I am sorry that this didn't come up sooner.
> 
> German.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Miguel Garcia [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: jueves, 27 de octubre de 2005 14:55
>>To: German Blanco (E2/EEM)
>>Cc: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: ISSUE: SIP-User-Data AVP is mandatory in PPR
>>
>>
>>Ok, I will change the text according to the suggestion.
>>
>>/Miguel
>>
>>German Blanco (E2/EEM) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Description of issue: More information than required in the PPR
>>>Submitter name: German Blanco
>>>Submitter email address: [email protected]
>>>Date first submitted: 27 Oct 05
>>>Document: sip
>>>Comment type: T
>>>Priority: 1
>>>Sections: 7.11
>>>Rationale/Explanation of issue: It is specified that the PPR command
>>>contains at least one SIP-User-Data AVP with the user 
>>
>>profile, however,
>>
>>>it is possible that only the charging addresses included in the 
>>>SIP-Accounting-Information AVP change.  In that case, the 
>>
>>Diameter server
>>
>>>would be forcing the client to parse the information included in the
>>>SIP-User-Data AVP, only to find out that there are no changes.
>>>
>>>Requested change: Change the message format so that SIP-User-Data is
>>>optional.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
>>sip:[email protected]
>>Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland
>>
>>

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
sip:[email protected]
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland