RE: : The Diameter Maintanence and Extentions WG proposed charter

Hi Julien & Vidya,

> FYI, with current mip6 bootstrapping solutions we don't need 
>to define a new  Diameter Application, just an AVP (to carry 
>the HA) because we assume  that Diameter NASREQ or EAP is use. (cf.
> draft-tschofenig-aaa-ha-diameter-01.txt)
>
> For FMIP6, we may need to define a new Diameter application 
>since what  we are doing is AAA for the FMIP6 'application' 
>and not for network  access.

For the purposes of the DiME WG proposal, I think I am still lumping 
MIPv6, FMIPv6 & MIPv6 bootstrapping into one topic.  I think having
a single AAA document that addresses these points probably would be
useful.  However, as the MIP/FMIP work is still on-going, we can
address this after there is consensus in the mobility-related WGs
about what specifically is needed.

Does this sound reasonable?
John