RE: : The Diameter Maintanence and Extentions WG proposed charter

>The idea of a "Maintenance" WG is that we can work on 
>maintanance of all the documents in that space (in this case 
>existing AAA WG documents).
>So I prefer a more generic work item aka:
>
>   - Maintaining and/or Progressing (along the standards track) 
>     Diameter documents
>
>I would then add something to the effect:
>
>   every revision document to be "maintained" needs explicit approval
>   before it will be accepted as a WG document. 
>
>In other words, this is not an "open ended" approval for revisions.
>We need to consider all such revision work carefully before we 
>(as a WG) embark on it.

This sounds reasonable to me.

John