Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore with the VDSL MIB)
"Michael Sneed" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
During the IETF Last Call process there were some concerns expressed in the
IESG about the HCTC Performance Interval MIB
(draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-06.txt) that we have recommended to go to Proposed
Standard. In a nutshell, the problem is one of alignment of the various
MIBs that deal with this topic (namely RFC3593 and 2856).
As a result of this discussion, it has been recommended that we change
- HCPerfTimeElapsed, Gauge32 (0...86399)
- HCPerfValidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
- HCPerfInvalidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
to type Integer32.
Does anyone wish to comment on this change before the editors put in in a
new draft?
_________________________________________________________________
Is your computer infected with a virus? Find out with a FREE computer virus
scan from McAfee. Take the FreeScan now!
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963