Re: Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore with the VDSL MIB)

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:06, Michael Sneed wrote:
> During the IETF Last Call process there were some concerns expressed in the 
> IESG about the HCTC Performance Interval MIB 
> (draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-06.txt) that we have recommended to go to Proposed 
> Standard.  In a nutshell, the problem is one of alignment of the various 
> MIBs that deal with this topic (namely RFC3593 and 2856).
> 
> As a result of this discussion, it has been recommended that we change
> 
>     - HCPerfTimeElapsed, Gauge32 (0...86399)
>     - HCPerfValidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
>     - HCPerfInvalidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
> 
> to type Integer32.
> 
> 
> Does anyone wish to comment on this change before the editors put in in a 
> new draft?

Anyone have an objection?  A chorus of 'No's would be appreciated.  Or at
least one. :) 

Bob