draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-05
"Clay Sikes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
All, The current version of the "Definitions of Managed Objects for G.shdsl.bis Lines" draft is -05. Please accept my apology for not keeping this list up to date on the changes. This message should outline the changes made to the draft, since the -02 version. On August 20, 2004, Mike Sneed, the adslmib Chair, issued a Last Call on version -02 of the draft. On August 24, 2004, Randy Presuhn, sent two messages containing a list of comments and issues with version -02. Let me say that I am extremely grateful to Randy for the time he put in the review. His review was extremely detailed and generated an awesome list of comments. His messages containing the comments can be found on the ADSL MIB Discussion Archive. The changes from version -02 to version -03 address each comment Randy had. Below is an outline of the significant changes: 1. The tool I used to generate a draft was updated which resulted in some boiler plate and white space changes. 2 Changes to the HDSL2-SHDSL-LINE-MIB portion were as follows: 2a.. LAST-UPDATED was updated. 2b. WG-URL was added. 2c. REVISION list was collapsed and updated. 2d. Added explicit bounds to objects pertaining to Rates. The explicit bound matches Unsigned32 in SMIv2. 2e. Added REFERENCEs to the objects in the hdsl2ShdslInventoryTable. 2f. Added hdsl2ShdslPayloadRateGroup. 2g. Removed hdsl2ShdslStatusMaxAttainablePayloadRate and hdsl2ShdslStatusActualPayloadRate from the hdsl2ShdslSpanStatusGroup and add them to the hdsl2ShdslPayloadRateGroup. 2h. Changed the hdsl2ShdslCurrShdslGroup to hdsl2ShdslWirePairGroup. I messed up the process of submitting version -03 with respect to saying what version it was and having that match what was in the draft, so I submitted version -04. In version -04, the LAST-UPDATED and REVISION were updated. Even when I submitted version -04 to the IETF, I had everything in the draft correct, but I stated in my email it was -03. I guess I'm just a slow-learning, stupid newbie. Fortunately, the IETF didn't post what said, but posted what was in the draft, so it worked out. God bless the IETF! On September 2, 2004, Randy Presuhn, commented that I had some dangling references after the last round of edits. As a result, version -05 was submitted with the following changes: 1. LAST-UPDATED was updated. 2. REVISION was updated. Remember the REVISIONs are collapsed since the draft is that close to being an RFC. 3. The following dangling references were removed: 3a. RFC 1155 3b. RFC 1157 3c. RFC 1212 3d. RFC 1215 3e. RFC 1901 3f. RFC 3412 3g. RFC 3413 3h. RFC 3416 3i. RFC 3417 3j. T1.213-2001 This should bring us up to the -05 version of the draft. I didn't go through the details of each change. Instead, I highlighted the "major" ones. In anyone needs to look at any of the versions, please let me know and I would be happy to send them to you. Again, sorry I haven't been updating the list. As a newbie, I wasn't sure if I should, but since have learned that it's necessary. Regards, Clay Sikes -- Paradyne Mail --