Re: draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-08
"Clay Sikes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bob, I hope you don't feel I was trying to put any blame on you or anyone else. Hindsight is always 20/20. I was just worried about another spin taking a long time after the draft becomes a standard. Hopefully that won't happen. - Clay Bob Ray wrote: Mike Heard writes: Unfortunately, moving TCs (or other any definitions) to a different MIB module breaks backward compatibility with any MIB modules (including, possibly, enterprise MIB modules) that IMPORT those TCs >from HDSL2-SHDSL-LINE-MIB. For this reason, it is usually not considered acceptable to move definitions from one MIB module to another. See RFC 2578, Section 10, next-to-last paragraph on p. 37. I take the blame for this. The HDSL2 => HDSL2/g.SHDSL => g.SHDSL.bis is still burdened with my first attempt at an internet draft. Sorry, Clay. Bob _______________________________________________ Adslmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib -- Paradyne Mail -- _______________________________________________ Adslmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib