Re: draft-ietf-adslmib-gshdslbis-08

"Clay Sikes" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks Mike.

The idea about a separate TC module won't be moved forward due to the
point you made.

Regards,

Clay

C. M. Heard wrote:

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Clay Sikes wrote:
[ ... overview of changes snipped ... ]

Next, I'm asking for two things:
1. Look over the changes and make sure I didn't break anything.
I especially need Bert, Randy, and Mike to review the changes.

All of my review comments seem to have been addressed. I
particularly commend the effort that you put into the Security
Considerations section; it looks like a lot of thought went into
that. The work that you put into the section on notification
throttling is also appreciated. As for the formatting/editorial
changes, it all looks for the better ... I did not see anything
that got broken.

2. Before we push this draft any further, I would like to propose
a significant change to the draft and am looking for anyone
who thinks the proposal is a bad idea. I would like to break
out the TCs such that they are in a separate TC-MIB module.
The reason is that it has taken a lot of time to update this
MIB module to support G.shdsl.bis. If there needs to be a
future update, and the annex list is a concern, the change may
go faster if only a TC Module needs to be updated. This would
require at least another spin of the draft along with creating
a dependency. In anyone feels that this a bad idea, please
let me know. I will not move forward on this if the group
feels it's a bad idea.

Unfortunately, moving TCs (or other any definitions) to a different
MIB module breaks backward compatibility with any MIB modules
(including, possibly, enterprise MIB modules) that IMPORT those TCs
from HDSL2-SHDSL-LINE-MIB. For this reason, it is usually not
considered acceptable to move definitions from one MIB module to
another. See RFC 2578, Section 10, next-to-last paragraph on p. 37.

Mike

-- Paradyne Mail --

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.