Re: proposed change in draft-ietf-adslmib-adsl2-07.txt
"Mauro Molinari" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF3FBB56CF.4B6D5EAF-ONC1257178.002C0A71-C1257178.002DA6E4@uk.marconicomms.com> |
Hi Menachen,
although I agree with the proposed changes to "
adsl2LineConfProfModeSpecTable" in order to reflect all
the variants of ADSL2 / ADSL2plus reported in "
adsl2LConfProfAtuTransSysEna",
I can't understand why we would need an entry in in that table also for
ADSL (G.992.1) and G.lite (G.992.2).
In my opinion in that case the PSDmask is uniquely determined by the
standard and there is no additional information or degree of freedom
using the dedicated mode-specific profiles.
On the other hand using the new proposed "adsl2LineConfProfModeSpecTable"
including the first 14 value ( 1 to 14 ) requires
the agent to check for consistency.
Regards,
Mauro Molinari