RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0B1FC5E9@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Menachem,
 
I am adding David Kessens who is the shepherding AD for hubmib (I, being
the chair, cannot play both roles). 
 
Why should ifAvailableStack be defined in a separate MIB module, rather
than changing the text in DESCRIPTION clauses and having it imported by
ADSL MIB modules from EFM-CU-MIB? 
 
Speaking as WG chair, I feel that in case a major change is introduced
in the document the WGLC needs to be redone. At this moment we agreed
for a technical iteration to fix some smilint problems without redoing
the LC. 
 
Dan
 
 
 


  _____  

	From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:08 PM
	To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]
	Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
	Subject: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work
	
	

	Hello Dan, 
	
	
	        Recently the issue of xDSL bonding has been raised on
the ADSL MIB WG mailing list. 
	
	        I have spoken briefly with Edward and we think that it
should be possible for us to re-use the ifAvailableStack table defined
in 
	 draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05. 
	
	        I would like to ask Edward to separate out this table
into a separate MIB (possibly in the same document) generalizing the
comments, 
	that would allow the ADSL MIB WG  to make use of these tables,
if this work becomes chartered. 
	
	        I would appreciate your advice on this issue. 
	
	Best Regards, 
	Menachem Dodge

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.