RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.adslmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0B1FC5E9@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Menachem, I am adding David Kessens who is the shepherding AD for hubmib (I, being the chair, cannot play both roles). Why should ifAvailableStack be defined in a separate MIB module, rather than changing the text in DESCRIPTION clauses and having it imported by ADSL MIB modules from EFM-CU-MIB? Speaking as WG chair, I feel that in case a major change is introduced in the document the WGLC needs to be redone. At this moment we agreed for a technical iteration to fix some smilint problems without redoing the LC. Dan _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:08 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work Hello Dan, Recently the issue of xDSL bonding has been raised on the ADSL MIB WG mailing list. I have spoken briefly with Edward and we think that it should be possible for us to re-use the ifAvailableStack table defined in draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05. I would like to ask Edward to separate out this table into a separate MIB (possibly in the same document) generalizing the comments, that would allow the ADSL MIB WG to make use of these tables, if this work becomes chartered. I would appreciate your advice on this issue. Best Regards, Menachem Dodge _______________________________________________ Adslmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib