Re: RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.adslmib
Message-ID <OFDA21B481.A323E2A5-ONC22571D7.0045905A-C22571D7.0049FF83@ecitele.com>
Hello Dan,

        What you suggest is fine, but I would rather that the table be 
placed under the ifMIB - ifMIBObjects branch together with
the ifStack Table or perhaps directly under MIB-2 as the ifInvertedStack 
MIB is situated. Being placed inside the efmCuMIB branch
seems to suggest  that it is  for the sole use of the efmCuMIB and this is 
no longer the case if the xDSL MIB modules import it.
 

Best Regards,
Menachem Dodge




"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> 
27/08/2006 12:47

To
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc
[email protected], "David Kessens \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, 
[email protected]
Subject
[Adslmib] RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work






Menachem,
 
I am adding David Kessens who is the shepherding AD for hubmib (I, being 
the chair, cannot play both roles). 
 
Why should ifAvailableStack be defined in a separate MIB module, rather 
than changing the text in DESCRIPTION clauses and having it imported by 
ADSL MIB modules from EFM-CU-MIB? 
 
Speaking as WG chair, I feel that in case a major change is introduced in 
the document the WGLC needs to be redone. At this moment we agreed for a 
technical iteration to fix some smilint problems without redoing the LC. 
 
Dan
 
 
 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:08 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work


Hello Dan, 


        Recently the issue of xDSL bonding has been raised on the ADSL MIB 
WG mailing list. 

        I have spoken briefly with Edward and we think that it should be 
possible for us to re-use the ifAvailableStack table defined in 
 draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05. 

        I would like to ask Edward to separate out this table into a 
separate MIB (possibly in the same document) generalizing the comments, 
that would allow the ADSL MIB WG  to make use of these tables, if this 
work becomes chartered. 

        I would appreciate your advice on this issue. 

Best Regards, 
Menachem Dodge_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.