Re: URLs and TLS

On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> Seems OK to me, but I'd add "none" to the list. This means "TLS is not at
> all required". This may be trivial, but it covers all of the bases so a URL
> emitter can always put the "TLS=" in the URLs it creates. I'm fine without
> it too.

"none" is what you get when you omit the ";TLS=" parameter.  Having a
distinct "none" value wouldn't be backwards compatible with existing URL
interpretors.

		- Chris