Re: URLs and TLS

> On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
> > Seems OK to me, but I'd add "none" to the list. This means "TLS is not at
> > all required". This may be trivial, but it covers all of the bases so a
> > URL emitter can always put the "TLS=" in the URLs it creates. I'm fine
> > without it too.
> 
> "none" is what you get when you omit the ";TLS=" parameter.  Having a
> distinct "none" value wouldn't be backwards compatible with existing URL
> interpretors.

Chris,

I'm trying to come up to speed on these UR[LN] issues, and would greatly
appreciate it if you could provide a short list of web-accessible documents
that you found to be the most helpful.  Book titles/ISBN#s welcome too :-).

thanks,
/msb