RE: WG Last Call: HTTP over TLS (draft-ietf-tls-https-02.txt)

Rene Eberhard <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Aug 1999 08:03:26 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.apps-tls
Message-ID <C7657405A7D6D21185950008C724736504A792@schzmxs1.europe.entrust.com>
> > Of course you are right. But why use synonyms when you can
> > use "closure alert" or "close_notify"?
> 
> Does it use synonyms?  As far as I remember, the draft always says
> "closure alert" when talking about the TLS facility of this name, and
> says "connection close" only when discussing events at the underlying
> transport protocol.

No it doesn't. I'm sorry. I've read it in the wrong context.

Regards Rene
     

BTW: What about the TLS related HTTP variables? For HTTPS gateways 
     this could be defined in this draft. We should also synchronize 
     with the "draft-coar-cgi-v11-02.txt" people.