Re: Roster of members ...
cw <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:33:37 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jesse Dougherty wrote: > 5) otherwise smart people (not exclusive, hopefully other members fit > this as well!) *please excuse the large ramble Once upon a time I would fit into that category but now that real life has hit I guess I'm just a techie trying to do stuff to help. Infact I have gone one more level than that. I am a final year student in Networks & Communications at Sheffield Hallam University (UK). I've worked in a UK ISP and at Manchester Computing so I'm not completely academic :0) The main reason I am here is, as someone else said, in relation to my final year project. Before being added to the list I did try to send an initial email using the archive interface but that didn't like me, more specifically didn't like the lines over 80 characters. This is the relevant section from that: For my final year dissertation I am looking into some parts of spam filtering. From what I've read so far, this group appears to be primarily concerned with (for example the quoted RFC 3028) recipient filtering based upon a ruleset. One of the aspects of my project is to look into various current anti-spam solutions (for example DNSBLS) and the way that they communicate their data. I haven't looked into this much yet so I'm not that sure of whether there are any standards already defined on that or if that is within the scope of this list. To give a bit more detail, the idea behind my project was that several blacklist operators have been forced offline due to large DDoS attacks. We generally need everyone we can get to fight spam and it would be useful to have a system that does not rely solely on the few anti-spam organisations that are able to devise and can sponsorship for sufficient bandwidth to sink these attacks. If there is a single standard for the communication of data utilised by all blacklist operators and similar services, then a distribution network (such as a decentralised peer network) could be set up that would benefit all. If this is not the appropriate list to discuss this then I apologise and ask if anyone could point me in the direction of any existing resources that they know of. Regards, Colin Waring