Re: ASRG/Filtering List Launch: "Let the games begin!"
John Graham-Cumming <[email protected]> Sun, 08 Feb 2004 10:21:37 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yakov Shafranovich wrote: > 1. A standard header to be produced by the filters that can be used by > the end-user's MUA. Having a standard header may reduce the complexity > that the user needs to go through when configuring his MUA to parse > filtering results. A good starting point might be to review the headers that current implementations are inserting to understand the intent of each header and how it is used. POPFile adds two headers to each message: X-Text-Classification: <class> This is the type of the message as determined by the text classifier, the class is user defined, but in a typical 2 class usage the user would specify something like spam and inbox as classes. (POPFile supports arbitrary numbers of classes hence there's no specific mention of spam in the program). X-POPFile-Link: <url> This is a URL to the specific message as viewed in the POPFile user interface. This is done so that a user can go from their mail client directly to the same message in the POPFile UI to change its classification. Note that POPFile strips these headers from _incoming_ messages so that they cannot be forged, and it notes the presence of these headers on incoming messages as a token. > 2. Ways for filters to share information dynamically including possible > standards for formats and protocols. This may encompass dynamic updates > like anti-virus programs do, dynamic sharing of filtering data in > real-time, collaborative filtering etc. There's a lot of this going on with checksum updates. Are any of the checksum/hash systems on this list? John.