Roster of members ... davidnicol
david <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:27:59 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.filtering |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello group. My name is David Nicol and I have been using e-mail since
1985 when
I had a bitnet account at Boston University and I was active on the
"metaphilosophers"
mailing list. In the early 1990s, I was the treasurer of a student
organization at
University of Missouri, and I wrote a general web interface to my duties
as Keeper
Of The Organizational Checkbook, which became and continues to be the
tipjar.com
money handling service. The trivial business model of tipjar.com is
that by taking
care of money handling for all comers, indentified only by their e-mail
addresses,
for free, eventually tipjar LLC will be holding enough of other people's
funds to
earn enough interest by making conservative investments to pay its
expenses. This
has not yet happened. Towards bringing money in from somewhere, I have
embarked
on designing and implementing a sender-pays e-mail system, which can be
signed up
for -- free forwarding addresses -- at www.pay2send.com.
The pay2send smtpd server, which I have been developing and testing and
would
probably be better off working on instead of writing this e-mail,
filters during the
SMTP steps rather than after accepting a message.
I seek collaborators on developing an interoperable domain-domain
sender-pays
communication standard; which is not strictly on-topic for "filtering."
Without the sender-pays component, Advenge SMTPD (the product I'm
developing)
fitlers as follows:
MAIL FROM: <[email protected]>
check to see if we have a sender account for yadda and if so has yadda
registered
a peer smtp host list and if so is the current connection from a peer on
yadda's list?
If not, reject, with instructions on how to add a temporary host. After
six hours
switch to a permanent reject code.
RCPT TO: <[email protected]>
Check to see if customer has listed yadda as their friend, and if so
we're good,
otherwise we're provisional. Provisional means:
* only one recipient is allowed, further recipients are rejected
with 4** temp codes
* we defer accept/reject decision until we have seen the body and
parsed it for "magic phrases"
There's more -- I am not certain if I will GPL Advenge SMTPD or try to
sell it, yet; probably the
former.
Sign up at www.pay2send.com for a forwarding account if you wish.
So what I've got is essentially a "consent framework" although not
within the formal consent
framework that the consent framework working group is working on, which
as near as I could
gather proposes to export user preferences through a redundant method
which, when followed,
would avoid initiating the SMTP transaction for a piece of unwanted mail.
As if SMTP was that complex. It isn't.