Re: Roster of members ...

On Tuesday 17 February 2004 20:29, Jesse Dougherty wrote:

> I suggest that we should have representation from:
>
> 1) filter developers (commercial and open source)
> 2) MUA developers
> 3) MTA
> 4) workgroup server developers (Microsoft, IBM, etc)
> 5) otherwise smart people (not exclusive, hopefully other members fit
> this as well!)

I'm in #5 (I hope): just trying to build an MTA filter built on top of 
spambayes, as an hobby in my spare time.

What I'm more interested is:
 - a standard header to tag messages
 - a standard way to make the user interact with (train) a remote filter 
running at the MTA level
 - a standard way to couple a normal MTA with a server filter
 - ways a filter can take advantage of running on MTA, WRT the same filter 
running on the MUA (e.g. knows envelope sender and recipient list, can tarpit 
the spammer, knows which text is being sent to many addresses on the same 
server, knows who is sending messages to non-existent or honeypot addresses, 
and so on).

-- 
http://thisurlenablesemailtogetthroughoverzealousspamfilters.org