Re: [Asrg] Patrik Falstrom's mailflow chart -- "upstream

From: Laird Breyer <[email protected]>
>On Feb 19 2004, David Nicol wrote:
> >
> > Hey -- doing this doesn't even require new protocols.  IMAP includes
...............
> > special implications of moving a message into a folder with a
> > particular name.
>
>I think you're temporarily forgetting that different countries have
>different names for things. It's allright to insert a message header
>defacto in English, but relying on a folder named "Junk" won't
>work. Moreover, what happens when the user rearranges his folders
>months later?

In these days, I'll think even we spam-ridden non-native english users could 
accept a standard IMAP box for spam. As a matter of fact, since spam is spam 
in many languages, why call it "Junk", let there be "Spam" ;-).

Regards Kurt

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail