Re: MASS BOF at San Diego IETF meeting

"Barclay, Robert" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:59:05 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg.msgverify
Message-ID <6956D00165F4CB4583BB9CC33D77364F0493B63F@denca00.corp.exactis.com>
Considering the minimal volume of discussion this list has had so far I
don't think that there is much chance of conflicting discussion going on,
and this is clearly within the charter of what this subgroup is to be
discussing anyway.
Does anyone have a list of links to the current versions of the documents
listed below and/or any others that may be relevant reading prior to the
BOF? Some of them I have read more recently than others, and I'd like to
make sure I am up to date.

Robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Fenton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: MASS BOF at San Diego IETF meeting
> 
> 
> There hasn't been much activity on this list and I'm not sure 
> who's here, but participants will likely be interested in the 
> fact that there will be a BoF session on Message 
> Authentication Signature Standards (MASS).  The intent of the 
> BoF is to work toward formation of a Working Group to address 
> signature-based approaches to fraudulent email (of which most 
> spam is a subset) such as DomainKeys, Identified Internet 
> Mail, E-mail Postmarks, and MTA Signatures (not intended to 
> be a complete list).
> 
> The BoF is currently scheduled for Thursday morning, but I 
> have been asked to caution everyone that the schedule is 
> still tentative.  MARID and the ASRG meeting are scheduled 
> (tentatively) for Wednesday.  I'm hoping for an active, but 
> orderly discussion.
> 
> John Levine has suggested that this list might be used as the 
> BOF/WG mailing list.  That would necessitate it being changed 
> to an open mailing list, and I'm not sure if the ASRG 
> subgroup might like to have discussions of its own.  We can 
> easily host the list elsewhere if that's appropriate.  How do 
> the members of this list feel?
> 
> -Jim
>