Re: MASS BOF at San Diego IETF meeting
"Barclay, Robert" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:59:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.msgverify |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6956D00165F4CB4583BB9CC33D77364F0493B63F@denca00.corp.exactis.com> |
Considering the minimal volume of discussion this list has had so far I don't think that there is much chance of conflicting discussion going on, and this is clearly within the charter of what this subgroup is to be discussing anyway. Does anyone have a list of links to the current versions of the documents listed below and/or any others that may be relevant reading prior to the BOF? Some of them I have read more recently than others, and I'd like to make sure I am up to date. Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Fenton [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: MASS BOF at San Diego IETF meeting > > > There hasn't been much activity on this list and I'm not sure > who's here, but participants will likely be interested in the > fact that there will be a BoF session on Message > Authentication Signature Standards (MASS). The intent of the > BoF is to work toward formation of a Working Group to address > signature-based approaches to fraudulent email (of which most > spam is a subset) such as DomainKeys, Identified Internet > Mail, E-mail Postmarks, and MTA Signatures (not intended to > be a complete list). > > The BoF is currently scheduled for Thursday morning, but I > have been asked to caution everyone that the schedule is > still tentative. MARID and the ASRG meeting are scheduled > (tentatively) for Wednesday. I'm hoping for an active, but > orderly discussion. > > John Levine has suggested that this list might be used as the > BOF/WG mailing list. That would necessitate it being changed > to an open mailing list, and I'm not sure if the ASRG > subgroup might like to have discussions of its own. We can > easily host the list elsewhere if that's appropriate. How do > the members of this list feel? > > -Jim >