Re: A Quickhack
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Oct 2003 21:44:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg.rmx |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 01:32:37PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote: > > Let's try an example. > > mail.example.com == 1.2.3.4 > ftp.example.com == 1.2.3.5 > *.3.2.1._asrg_rmx_.example.com = "permitted to send smtp" > > A recipient MTA receives a request from 1.2.3.4, but the EHLO says > "ftp.example.com". I think this is a bad example, because the machine is misconfigured. Misconfigured machines are alway a problem of their own. I would give another example which is not far away, but meets my experiences, the already mentioned NAT problem: relay.example.com = 192.168.1.1 firewall.example.com = 1.2.3.4 Now the relay opens a connection and gets NATted to 1.2.3.4, while the DNS A PTR for relay.example.com is 192.168.1.1 This is a common mistake in DNS configuration. Do we require people to have a proper DNS configuration or do we do a "workaround" for bad DNS entries? Hadmut