Re: [taugh.com-johnl] Re: [taugh.com-johnl] Re: Problems with

> I'm not talking about ISPs. I'm talking about plain corporate
> networks. Many people still require that every/many PCs in the
> network are able to send e-mail.

All the corporate networks I know run the mail through a small number of
gateway mail servers, so the situation is the same.

> > > - Use an MUA which can display the envelope. Better MUAs do that.
> > >   Others will have to learn it.
> >
> > I think a purported solution that expects that everyone will get a new MUA
> > isn't a very practical solution.
>
> You seem to prefer to intentionally misunderstand everything you
> don't like. "everyone will get a new MUA" is just nonsense.

Maybe my English isn't as good as yours but in my dialect, "Others will
have to learn it" means that everyone using an MUAs other than the
minority that display the envelope now will have to get new versions.

> Most MUAs are able to display the envelope. And if not, in the
> RMX draft I proposed to add the verified sender name to the Received line.

That's nice.  Do you know any MTAs that display Received: lines by
default?  I don't.

> > > - Spammer friendly domain resellers will certainly be blacklisted.
> >
> > They aren't now, and we know who they are.  Why will LMAP make any
> > difference?
>
> Because until now it was impossible to do it. With LMAP it becomes
> possible and feasible.  Even if you don't like it.

You are evidently using a very different Internet than the one that I am
using.  Things that are impossible on your Internet are routine on the one
the I use.

Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.