Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc

On 2004-02-13, at 20.04, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:35:13PM +0500, Viktor S. Grishchenko wrote:
>>
>> Thus, it is strongly desirable to achieve
>> common viewpoint at Seoul and declare which LMAP proposal will be
>> accepted by IETF as a standard.
>
> So we should not call it a BOF, but an EOD (End of Discussion)
> then...
>
> Hadmut ;-)

:-)

As one of the BOF chairs (in this mail, compared with some others which 
included some bad choice of words) I say I am not afraid coming to the 
conclusion at the BOF that we could not find rough consensus on this 
issue.

I would be extremely dispointed, BUT, the intention is _not_ to declare 
rough consensus when the consensus is too rough.

The community _MUST_ understand the Internet need us to agree on 
something, and every extra day we argue about principles and not move 
forward, we loose one day of a deployed system.

So, please, all of us (including me), we MUST try to move forward.

    Regards, Patrik