Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc

Yakov Shafranovich wrote:

> Hadmut Danisch wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 02:35:13PM +0500, Viktor S. Grishchenko wrote:
>>
>>> Thus, it is strongly desirable to achieve common viewpoint at Seoul 
>>> and declare which LMAP proposal will be
>>> accepted by IETF as a standard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> So we should not call it a BOF, but an EOD (End of Discussion) then...
>>
>> Hadmut ;-)
>>
>
> The point of the BOF is to decide whether a WG should be working on a 
> standard, NOT to pick one of the ones presented. All of the LMAP 
> proposals will be input to the WG which can very well end up combining 
> bits and pieces from all of them to create a common standard.
>
> Yakov

So we should not call it a BOF, but a BOD (Beginning of Discussion) then...


Jeff  ;-)

P.S. And it is going to be a **serious** discussion, not a bunch of 
geeks sending one-liner jokes to one another, yes?  I mean, this is a 
serious problem facing the world and we're the ones in a position to Do 
Something about it.