Re: antiphishing idea

Martijn Grooten <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg
Message-ID <18B53BA2A483AD45962AAD1397BE1325382F75FA87@UK-EXCHMBX1.green.sophos>
> Domains should have to publish in their DNSs the message-id (among any
> other thing) through a TXT or A record of any legit mail sent by them.
> The TTLs of those records can be adjusted to compensate for queued
> mails, etc.

I take it you mean the message-id is somehow converted into a domain name and a DNS lookup is performed against that DNS and if the A or TXT record for that domain is some kind of affirmative value, this means that this is a 'valid message-id'?

I've got many doubts about this: do people who fall for such scams care about the value of From? Doesn't this have the same issues as SPF -all and ADSP? Does this scale? But my most important concern is: wouldn't it be trivial to perform a relay attack using this method?

> When you receive a mail from A and "aparently" from B you can query A
> and B DNSs looking for the message-id the mail has. If you have a
> nxdomain or whatever error from them you can score the mail as
> phishing! ..on the other hand if you have a hit from at least one of
> them you can be confident that this is the real domain that sends that
> mail or it sends it on behalf the real address!

I don't get this. Are you saying that if I send an email with MAIL FROM: example.com and Header From: paypal.com and the message-id on example.com that I can then get this message-id validated simply because I happen to control example.com?

Martijn.

Virus Bulletin Ltd, The Pentagon, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, England.
Company Reg No: 2388295. VAT Reg No: GB 532 5598 33.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.