Re: leaky lists, was The introduction problem
"John Levine" <[email protected]> 19 Mar 2013 01:52:31 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> When spammers steal lists that were actually opted-in to, they'll steal >> the keys along with them. > >And from that criminal act they will get to send one volley of spam to the users of that list (assuming that they can >convincingly forge the sending path) before the user invalidates the key. The users will learn which companies or >services are not sufficiently protecting their resources and the advertisers using the spammer service will have their >name associated with the specific criminal act to which they may face prosecution along with or instead of the spammer. A certain number of us use unique addresses whenever we sign up for a list, and there are clear patterns about who leaks and who doesn't. See recent posts on my blog at http://jl.ly. I can't see any evidence that places that leak pay any penalty for it. R's, John