Re: IPv6 mail, was Let's try to be productive...
Richard Clayton <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:04:46 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.asrg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[email protected]>, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> writes >On 1/8/2014 8:20 AM, Richard Clayton wrote: >> If IPv6 email really takes off (and that certainly won't be soon (IMO) >> apart from some special cases), then we might very well see ISPs and/or >> the really big mail handlers (Gmail, Yahoo &c) using one IPv6 address >> per account ... >> >> ... this will allow people to block (or perhaps whitelist) specific >> people who are using mass platforms without having to agonise over the >> pain of blocking "the whole of gmail/whatever" > >They don't have to wait. > >They could sign with DKIM, using a different d= domain name for every >user. > >By way of an easy convention to extend d= granularity, they could >'encode' the author's full address into d=, such as: > > <selector>._domainkey.<mailbox>._at.<domain> given the number of mailboxes at the large providers, this will make the task of DNSSEC signing the .com domain (a mere 113 million domains) look somewhat trivial in comparison >ps. No, this doesn't enable evaluation when the connection is first >attempted or opened. assessing the load on DNS servers and contrasting that with the impact of existing reputation systems would doubtless be instructive - -- richard Richard Clayton They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBUzQh7uINNVchEYfiEQKdsQCg78hsU/jVkJLAvo3DfwfUy2G0VA8AnjIt bhCwjBR6P06TU8GgQYl6yWlS =ydlk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - This is the asrg mailing list. To change your subscription settings, see http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org