Re: IPv6 mail, was Let's try to be productive...

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:04:46PM +0000, Richard Clayton wrote:
> >They don't have to wait.
> >
> >They could sign with DKIM, using a different d= domain name for every 
> >user.
> >
> >By way of an easy convention to extend d= granularity, they could 
> >'encode' the author's full address into d=, such as:
> >
> >   <selector>._domainkey.<mailbox>._at.<domain>
> 
> given the number of mailboxes at the large providers, this will make the
> task of DNSSEC signing the .com domain (a mere 113 million domains) look
> somewhat trivial in comparison

I also don't see how using the same d= domain but adding granularity by
putting per-user values in the envelope from wouldn't have the same
effect. 

Martijn.

-
This is the asrg mailing list.  To change your subscription settings, see
http://lists.services.net/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr/domain=lists.gurus.org