Re: RFC Terminology

"Marshall T. Rose" <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:57:01 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.beep
Message-ID	<000001c234cd$1f0b9cf0$0701000a@FATORA>

some of us don't like SHOUTING!

others of us feel that people who know how to write specifications well
don't need the formalisms that 2119 provides.

/mtr
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Paul Andrews
  To: Beepwg
  Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 08:13
  Subject: [BEEPwg] RFC Terminology

  Is there any particular reason why the BEEP RFCs don't use the terminology
recommended in RFC 2119?