RE: RFC Terminology

"Paul Andrews" <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:38:37 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.beep
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

WELL ALL RIGHT THEN :-)
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Marshall T. Rose [mailto:[email protected]]
  Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 12:57 PM
  To: Paul Andrews; Beepwg
  Cc: Marshall Rose
  Subject: Re: [BEEPwg] RFC Terminology


  some of us don't like SHOUTING!

  others of us feel that people who know how to write specifications well
don't need the formalisms that 2119 provides.

  /mtr
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Paul Andrews
    To: Beepwg
    Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 08:13
    Subject: [BEEPwg] RFC Terminology


    Is there any particular reason why the BEEP RFCs don't use the
terminology recommended in RFC 2119?