Re: RFC Terminology
james woodyatt <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:58:13 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.beep |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, July 26, 2002, at 09:57 AM, Marshall T. Rose wrote: > [...] > others of us feel that people who know how to write specifications well > don't need the formalisms that 2119 provides. Some of the more jaded among us also feel that people who don't know how to *read* a well-written specification need a lot more help than the RFC 2119 formalisms provide. -- j h woodyatt <[email protected]>