Re: Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: (with COMMENT)
joel jaeggli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/4/14 5:42 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to > cut this introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more > information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found > here: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/ > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Shouldn't the conclusions from the discussion after the Gen-ART > review be incorporated to a new draft version? well if you have no major objections I thin this will fall into approved point-raised because I think there is room to address some of the outstanding comments. if you think I should hold it for that, I'll hold the discuss. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlSAgtEACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJF9ACgg4mV3kndFuYSicIn/moVC9O3 GGgAn3TaIl3Z2oXK77nJFetwXE/ULJVf =iE3r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----