Re: Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: (with COMMENT)

Joel Halpern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I still have not heard back about what appeared to me to be a small but signifciant technical error (the arithmetic in some of the cases seemed backwards).  Whether that, or the rest, should be point-raised and on your shoulders, or a discuss, is between you and Jari.

Yours,
Joel 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 10:51 AM
> To: Jari Arkko; The IESG
> Cc: Joel Halpern; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Jari Arkko's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: (with COMMENT)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 12/4/14 5:42 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04: No Objection
> > 
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and 
> reply to all 
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> > 
> > 
> > Please refer to
> > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more 
> > information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > 
> > 
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> > here: 
> > 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence/
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > 
> COMMENT:
> > 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  Shouldn't the conclusions from the discussion after the Gen-ART 
> > review be incorporated to a new draft version?
> 
> well  if you have no major objections I thin this will fall 
> into approved point-raised because I think there is room to 
> address some of the outstanding comments.
> 
> if you think I should hold it for that, I'll hold the discuss.
> 
> > 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlSAgtEACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJF9ACgg4mV3kndFuYSicIn/moVC9O3
> GGgAn3TaIl3Z2oXK77nJFetwXE/ULJVf
> =iE3r
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.