Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01: (with COMMENT)

On 05/08/2015 22:10, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Section 3:
> OLD
> Note that, a given vendor implementation may or may not permit the
> abortion of
>     the in-progress ISSU at particular stages.
>
> NEW
> Note that, a given vendor implementation may or may not permit halting
> the in-progress ISSU at particular stages.
>
> OLD
> the test
>     plan document should reflect these and other relevant details and
>     SHOULD be written with close attention
>
> NEW
> the test
>     plan document should reflect these and other relevant details and
>     should be written with close attention
yep, that's another instance of my remark:

    Note: potentially some other discrepancies with lower/upper case
    MUST/SHOULD/MAY

In a private engagement with Fernando, I advised him: "you should really 
check all instances of must, should, may, MUST, SHOULD, MAY"

Regards, Benoit

>
>
> .
>

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg