Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bmwg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - I was a bit surprised there was no reference to software signing here (only checksums are mentioned). The difference is that signature verification can also sometimes require e.g. an OCSP lookup to check for revocation and that could I guess impact on benchmarking. (The secdir reviewer also made this point.) - Kathleen makes a good point in her comment too.