Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-i etf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One minor question:
sec 3.4: "The recommended flow classification parameters for any
vswitch
   performance tests are: the input port (physical or logical), the
   source IP address, the destination IP address and the Ethernet
   protocol type field."
Why does this not include the transport ports? Is it assumed that there
is always only one flow between two IP addresses during a test?

Minor editorial comment:
Not sure why it is so important to mention several times that this work
is done "by referencing existing literature" (without referencing any
additional work beside opnfv)...?


_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg