Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and comments. One nit:
>
> s/for a future draft/for a future document/
>

Good catch! Thank you for helping improve the document - I think that
the changes make it much better.

Dear authors, please note this to flag for the RFC Editor ( will as
well, but just in case).

W
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf