Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Kumari [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2017 10:05 AM
> To: Alissa Cooper
> Cc: The IESG; [email protected]; [email protected]; draft-ietf-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-
> opnfv-04: (with COMMENT)
> 
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-bmwg-vswitch-opnfv-04: No Objection
> >
...
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and comments. One nit:
> >
> > s/for a future draft/for a future document/
> >
> 
> Good catch! Thank you for helping improve the document - I think that
> the changes make it much better.
[ACM] 
+1, and for seeing the value in this draft as a contribution/RFC.
Benoit's comments helped capture that value more accurately,
too.

> 
> Dear authors, please note this to flag for the RFC Editor ( will as
> well, but just in case).
[ACM] 
Will do, at AUTH48 or sooner.

Al

> 
> W
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf