[ippm] Re: [savnet] Call for adoption: draft-chen-bmwg -savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 (Ends 2026-02-04)

Hi all,

I support the adoption of draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08 as a working group document.
This draft provides a comprehensive framework for benchmarking SAV mechanisms, which addresses a critical need in the networking community. The document will enable consistent and comparable evaluations across different SAV implementations. 
The authors have addressed my earlier comments, incorporating improvements that have strengthened the document. I believe this work has reached sufficient maturity for WG adoption.

Best,
Yuanyuan Zhang


> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker" <[email protected]>
> 发送时间:2026-01-14 18:02:44 (星期三)
> 收件人: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> 抄送: [email protected], [email protected]
> 主题: [savnet] Call for adoption: draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08  (Ends 2026-02-04)
> 
> This message starts a bmwg WG Call for Adoption of:
> draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08
> 
> This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-02-04
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document defines methodologies for benchmarking the performance
>    of intra-domain and inter-domain source address validation (SAV)
>    mechanisms.  SAV mechanisms are utilized to generate SAV rules to
>    prevent source address spoofing, and have been implemented with many
>    various designs in order to perform SAV in the corresponding
>    scenarios.  This document takes the approach of considering a SAV
>    device to be a black box, defining the methodology in a manner that
>    is agnostic to the mechanisms.  This document provides a method for
>    measuring the performance of existing and new SAV implementations.
> 
> Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption
> of this Internet-Draft by the bmwg WG. Comments to explain your preference
> are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and
> include this message in your response.
> 
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
> found at [3].
> 
> Thank you.
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-chen-bmwg-savnet-sav-benchmarking-08
> 
> -- 
> savnet mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]