[ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation polic y

Ruediger.Geib=40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected] Wed, 13 May 2026 07:19:54 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.bmwg
Message-ID <BEZP281MB20072009EF300332674BD6349C062@BEZP281MB2007.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
--===============3639075026608731234==
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
 micalg=2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1;
 boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01DCE2B9.A30A2350"

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01DCE2B9.A30A2350
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0006_01DCE2B9.A30A2350"


------=_NextPart_001_0006_01DCE2B9.A30A2350
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Thomas,

=20

the requirement =84SHOULD=93 expresses, what IETF expects to be there =
(its not a
MAY). Giving priority to std track drafts accompanied by an =
implementation
expresses that to me. So I look at proposal 1 to bear the quality of a
=93SHOULD=94 (but, as said, don=92t suggest requirement language in the =
charter).

=20

Proposal 2 reads like a =93MUST (be accompanied by an implementation) =
with
exceptions=94 to me (sticking to requirement definitions). My =
interpretation
of =93MUST with exceptions=94 is a SHOULD.

=20

Proposal 2 may require a charter definition or a WG discussion of the
exceptions. To me proposal 1 and 2 express similar expectations (I=92d
perceive the differences to be nuances). Consenting and operating =
proposal 1
looks easier.

=20

Regards,

=20

Ruediger

=20

=20

=20

Von: Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] <Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>=20
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2026 07:43
An: Geib, R=FCdiger <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; =
[email protected]
Betreff: RE: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation =
policy

=20

Dear Ruediger,

=20

Thats an interesting option. However as a chair my worries with "should" =
or
"is desirable" is how we exercise the policy. Lets assume the document
requests WGLC and has no implementation and no good reasoning why it =
doesn't
have an implementation. What would be the consequence? Wait for some =
time?
How long? And then, if there is still no implementation still go ahead =
with
WGLC?

=20

Prioritizes documents with implementations. For proposed work =
presentations
it simply means if there isn't enough space in the agenda and the =
document
doesn't have an implementation and others already have (there are cases =
were
authors already arrive at the working group with an implementation, =
believe
me), it won't be on the agenda but there is always the mailing list. If =
we
have multiple document in the queue for adoption or last call, the ones
having implementations are picked first. Or last but not least, interim
sessions are sometimes chosen to speed up things for a particular =
document
or set of documents, to resolve a problem. We would not do such interims =
if
there are no implementations.=20

=20

For requiring implementations. This means that a document can't get past
WGLC without. We chairs would monitor the progress of the document and =
help
and support the authors through the working group process by advertising =
the
document to potential implementors for hackathon activities and give =
those
hackathon activities time on the agenda.

=20

That=92s in a nutshell on top of my head what these options would mean.

=20

I personally interpret "should" or "is desirable" as being delayed WGLC =
if
there is no implementation. Thoughts?

=20

Best wishes

Thomas

=20

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >=20
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 2:30 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; Graf Thomas,
SCS-INI-NET-VNC-E2E <Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
<mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> >; [email protected] =
<mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Subject: AW: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation =
policy

=20

=09
Be aware: This is an external email.

=20

Hi Adrian,

=20

thanks for pointing out. I failed to say that my =93SHOULD=94 only =
expresses a
charter requirement level from the given options. I do not suggest to =
apply
BCP14 requirement language in the charter.

=20

Regards, Ruediger

=20

Von: Adrian Farrel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >=20
Gesendet: Montag, 11. Mai 2026 13:15
An: Geib, R=FCdiger <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >; Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
<mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> =
;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Betreff: RE: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation =
policy

=20

May be =93is desirable=94 rather than put BCP14 language in a charter?

=20

A

=20

From: Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]
<mailto:Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]>
<Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]
<mailto:Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]> >=20
Sent: 11 May 2026 12:00
To: Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] <mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] =
<mailto:[email protected]>=20
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Subject: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation policy

=20

Dear Marcus, Giuseppe, Sarah and Thomas,

=20

I=92d prefer option 1. A =93SHOULD=94 requirement for an implementation =
to me
would be a clear expression of the WG intent and implicitly =
include/allow an
exception.=20

=20

Regards,

=20

Ruediger

=20

Von: Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] <mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
<Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] <mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> >=20
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2026 10:13
An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>=20
Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Betreff: [ippm] Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation policy

=20

Dear BMWG and IPPM,

=20

We have with  <https://github.com/ietf-ippm/wg-charter/issues/4>
https://github.com/ietf-ippm/wg-charter/issues/4 a suggestion from Med =
to
consider adding an implementation policy in the join charter proposal.

=20

We chairs have been thinking how this could be addressed best in the =
charter
and came up with the 3 proposals:

=20

1.	The WG prioritizes documents with implementations.
2.	The WG requires an implementation for standard track documents. In
some cases exceptions can be applied. Whenever such an exception =
applies,
the exception justification must be included in the specification =
document
or its write-up.
3.	The WG requires two implementations for standard track documents. In
some cases exceptions can be applied. Whenever such an exception =
applies,
the exception justification must be included in the specification =
document
or its write-up.

=20

The main differences between the choices are underlined.

=20

We would like to have feedback from both working groups on

=20

*	wherever an implementation policy should be added or not
*	wherever those choices make sense or not
*	which would be the preferred choice and why

=20

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7942 is a good quick read in
regards to implementations and implementation status section. Rough
consensus and running code is part of the IETF DNA. Personally we think =
it
is helpful for the authors if the working group states what is expected =
in
terms of implementations. There are good reasons for having =
implementations
such as raising quality of the document and ensure interoperability. But
there are also reasons to progress quickly. For instance in case where =
there
is only a small document update or a security fix.

=20

Best wishes

Marcus, Giuseppe, Sarah and Thomas

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20


------=_NextPart_001_0006_01DCE2B9.A30A2350
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=3DGenerator =
content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Wingdings;
	panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Aptos;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Trebuchet MS";
	panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0cm;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
	mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
	mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:#467886;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
	{mso-style-priority:34;
	margin-top:0cm;
	margin-right:0cm;
	margin-bottom:0cm;
	margin-left:36.0pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
	mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
	margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
	{mso-list-id:975447377;
	mso-list-type:hybrid;
	mso-list-template-ids:1167606882 134676495 134676505 134676507 =
134676495 134676505 134676507 134676495 134676505 134676507;}
@list l0:level1
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level2
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level3
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level5
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level6
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
	{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level8
	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;}
@list l0:level9
	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:right;
	text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1
	{mso-list-id:1004741355;
	mso-list-template-ids:-1604703296;}
@list l2
	{mso-list-id:1662348758;
	mso-list-template-ids:-405743170;}
@list l2:level1
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:36.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level2
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:72.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level3
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:108.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level4
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:144.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level5
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:180.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level6
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:216.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level7
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:252.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level8
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:288.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l2:level9
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:324.0pt;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3
	{mso-list-id:2084600692;
	mso-list-type:hybrid;
	mso-list-template-ids:-1489231030 -1834830122 134676483 134676485 =
134676481 134676483 134676485 134676481 134676483 134676485;}
@list l3:level1
	{mso-level-start-at:3;
	mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0D8;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;
	mso-fareast-font-family:Aptos;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@list l3:level2
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:o;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level3
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l3:level4
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3:level5
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:o;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level6
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l3:level7
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0B7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Symbol;}
@list l3:level8
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:o;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l3:level9
	{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
	mso-level-text:\F0A7;
	mso-level-tab-stop:none;
	mso-level-number-position:left;
	text-indent:-18.0pt;
	font-family:Wingdings;}
ol
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
ul
	{margin-bottom:0cm;}
--></style></head><body lang=3DDE link=3D"#467886" vlink=3D"#96607D" =
style=3D'word-wrap:break-word'><div class=3DWordSection1><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>Dear Thomas,<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>the requirement &#8222;SHOULD&#8220; expresses, what IETF =
expects to be there (its not a MAY). Giving priority to std track drafts =
accompanied by an implementation expresses that to me. So I look at =
proposal 1 to bear the quality of a &#8220;SHOULD&#8221; (but, as said, =
don&#8217;t suggest requirement language in the =
charter).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Proposal 2 reads like a &#8220;MUST (be accompanied by an =
implementation) with exceptions&#8221; to me (sticking to requirement =
definitions). My interpretation of &#8220;MUST with exceptions&#8221; is =
a SHOULD.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Proposal 2 may require a charter definition or a WG =
discussion of the exceptions. To me proposal 1 and 2 express similar =
expectations (I&#8217;d perceive the differences to be nuances). =
Consenting and operating proposal 1 looks =
easier.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Ruediger<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div><div =
style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'>Von:</span></b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'> Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected] =
&lt;Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]&gt; <br><b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 13. Mai =
2026 07:43<br><b>An:</b> Geib, R=FCdiger =
&lt;[email protected]&gt;; [email protected]; [email protected]; =
[email protected]<br><b>Cc:</b> [email protected]; [email protected]; =
[email protected]<br><b>Betreff:</b> RE: [ippm] Re: Joint =
BMWG/IPPM chartering - implementation =
policy<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DDE-CH style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:#0E2841'>Dear Ruediger,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DDE-CH =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:#0E2841'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:#0E2841'>Thats an interesting option. However as a =
chair my worries with &quot;should&quot; or &quot;</span><span =
lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>is =
desirable&quot; is how we exercise the policy. Lets assume the document =
requests WGLC and has no implementation and no good reasoning why it =
doesn't have an implementation. What would be the consequence? Wait for =
some time? How long? And then, if there is still no implementation still =
go ahead with WGLC?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</=
o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Prioritizes =
documents with implementations. For proposed work presentations it =
simply means if there isn't enough space in the agenda and the document =
doesn't have an implementation and others already have (there are cases =
were authors already arrive at the working group with an implementation, =
believe me), it won't be on the agenda but there is always the mailing =
list. If we have multiple document in the queue for adoption or last =
call, the ones having implementations are picked first. Or last but not =
least, interim sessions are sometimes chosen to speed up things for a =
particular document or set of documents, to resolve a problem. We would =
not do such interims if there are no implementations. =
<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</=
o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>For =
requiring implementations. This means that a document can't get past =
WGLC without. We chairs would monitor the progress of the document and =
help and support the authors through the working group process by =
advertising the document to potential implementors for hackathon =
activities and give those hackathon activities time on the =
agenda.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</=
o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>That&#8217;s =
in a nutshell on top of my head what these options would =
mean.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</=
o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>I personally =
interpret </span><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:#0E2841'>&quot;should&quot; or &quot;</span><span =
lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>is =
desirable&quot; as being delayed WGLC if there is no implementation. =
Thoughts?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'><o:p>&nbsp;</=
o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Best =
wishes<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Thomas</span>=
<span lang=3DDE-CH style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:gray;mso-ligatures:none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'>=
<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DDE-CH =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif;color:#0E2841'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><div><div =
style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'>From:</span></b><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> =
&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;=
 <br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 11, 2026 2:30 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; Graf =
Thomas, SCS-INI-NET-VNC-E2E &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]">Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]</a>&gt;=
; <a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]=
</a><br><b>Subject:</b> AW: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - =
implementation policy<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DDE-CH><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><table =
class=3DMsoNormalTable border=3D0 cellspacing=3D0 cellpadding=3D0 =
align=3Dleft width=3D"100%" style=3D'width:100.0%'><tr><td =
style=3D'background:#CF4A0C;padding:5.0pt 2.0pt 5.0pt 2.0pt'></td><td =
width=3D"100%" style=3D'width:100.0%;background:#FFF8E5;padding:5.0pt =
4.0pt 5.0pt 12.0pt'><div><p class=3DMsoNormal =
style=3D'mso-element:frame;mso-element-frame-hspace:2.25pt;mso-element-wr=
ap:around;mso-element-anchor-vertical:paragraph;mso-element-anchor-horizo=
ntal:column;mso-height-rule:exactly'><b><span =
style=3D'color:#222222;mso-ligatures:none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'>Be =
aware:</span></b><span =
style=3D'color:#222222;mso-ligatures:none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'> =
This is an external =
email.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></td></tr></table><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'mso-ligatures:none;mso-fareast-language:DE-CH'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>=
</span></p><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>Hi Adrian,<o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>thanks for pointing out. I failed to say that my =
&#8220;SHOULD&#8221; only expresses a charter requirement level from the =
given options. I do not suggest to apply BCP14 requirement language in =
the charter.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Regards, Ruediger</span><o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div =
style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'>Von:</span></b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'> Adrian Farrel &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; =
<br><b>Gesendet:</b> Montag, 11. Mai 2026 13:15<br><b>An:</b> Geib, =
R=FCdiger &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;=
; <a =
href=3D"mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]">Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]</a>; =
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]=
</a><br><b>Betreff:</b> RE: [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - =
implementation policy</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>May be =
&#8220;is desirable&#8221; rather than put BCP14 language in a =
charter?</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span>=
<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>A</span><o:p>=
</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span>=
<o:p></o:p></p><div><div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 =
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB'>From:</span></b><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:EN-GB'> <a =
href=3D"mailto:Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]">Ruediger.Geib=
=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]</a> &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:Ruediger.Geib=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]">Ruediger.Geib=
=3D40telekom.de-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]</a>&gt; <br><b>Sent:</b> 11 May 2026 =
12:00<br><b>To:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]">Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]</a>; =
<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]=
</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [ippm] Re: Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - =
implementation policy</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-GB>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US>Dear Marcus, Giuseppe, Sarah and =
Thomas,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>I&#8217;d prefer option 1. A &#8220;SHOULD&#8221; =
requirement for an implementation to me would be a clear expression of =
the WG intent and implicitly include/allow an exception. =
</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>Ruediger</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div =
style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm =
0cm 0cm'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'>Von:</span></b><span =
style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-ligatures:=
none;mso-fareast-language:DE'> <a =
href=3D"mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]">Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]</a> =
&lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]">Thomas.Graf-Zc0CTiu5wcBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]</a>&gt;=
 <br><b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2026 10:13<br><b>An:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>; <a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]=
</a><br><b>Betreff:</b> [ippm] Joint BMWG/IPPM chartering - =
implementation policy</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DDE-CH style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>Dear BMWG and IPPM,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DDE-CH =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>We have with </span><span lang=3DDE-CH =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'><a =
href=3D"https://github.com/ietf-ippm/wg-charter/issues/4"><span =
lang=3DEN-US>https://github.com/ietf-ippm/wg-charter/issues/4</span></a> =
</span><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>a =
suggestion from Med to consider adding an implementation policy in the =
join charter proposal.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>We chairs have been thinking how this could be addressed =
best in the charter and came up with the 3 =
proposals:</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><ol style=3D'margin-top:0cm' =
start=3D1 type=3D1><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>The WG =
<u>prioritizes</u> documents with =
implementations.</span><o:p></o:p></li><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>The WG =
<u>requires an</u> implementation for standard track documents. In some =
cases exceptions can be applied. Whenever such an exception applies, the =
exception justification must be included in the specification document =
or its write-up.</span><o:p></o:p></li><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo3'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>The WG =
<u>requires two</u> implementations for standard track documents. In =
some cases exceptions can be applied. Whenever such an exception =
applies, the exception justification must be included in the =
specification document or its write-up.</span><o:p></o:p></li></ol><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>The main differences between the choices are =
underlined.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>We would like to have feedback from both working groups =
on</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><ul style=3D'margin-top:0cm' =
type=3Ddisc><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo6'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>wherever an implementation policy should be added or =
not</span><o:p></o:p></li><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo6'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>wherever those choices make sense or =
not</span><o:p></o:p></li><li class=3DMsoListParagraph =
style=3D'margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l3 level1 lfo6'><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>which =
would be the preferred choice and why</span><o:p></o:p></li></ul><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'><a =
href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7942">https://datatracke=
r.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7942</a> is a good quick read in regards to =
implementations and implementation status section. Rough consensus and =
running code is part of the IETF DNA. Personally we think it is helpful =
for the authors if the working group states what is expected in terms of =
implementations. There are good reasons for having implementations such =
as raising quality of the document and ensure interoperability. But =
there are also reasons to progress quickly. For instance in case where =
there is only a small document update or a security =
fix.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>Best wishes</span><o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif'>Marcus, =
Giuseppe, Sarah and Thomas</span><o:p></o:p></p><p =
class=3DMsoNormal><span lang=3DEN-US =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet =
MS",sans-serif'>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
lang=3DEN-US>&nbsp;</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_001_0006_01DCE2B9.A30A2350--

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01DCE2B9.A30A2350
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
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------=_NextPart_000_0005_01DCE2B9.A30A2350--


--===============3639075026608731234==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KaXBwbSBtYWls
aW5nIGxpc3QgLS0gaXBwbUBpZXRmLm9yZwpUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSBzZW5kIGFuIGVtYWlsIHRv
IGlwcG0tbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK

--===============3639075026608731234==--