FW: VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.bridge |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15502582ABF@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
It seems that in IPCDN, some people would like
to see yet another TC, namely:
VlanIdOrZero ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "d"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
The value zero is NOT a valid VLAN ID.
When this textual convention is used as the
syntax of an object, the object definition
MUST specify in the DESCRIPTION clause what
the value zero means.
"
SYNTAX Integer32 (0 | 1..4094)
Does anyone see a problem with that?
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2003 0:48
To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
Subject: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
So... nobody has reacted to my request for
writeup. So I am preparing to do an ID myself.
This is what I think the discussion boiled down to.
VlanId ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "d"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN."
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..4094)
VlanIdOrAny ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "d"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
The value of 4095 is used to indicate a wildcard,
i.e. any value.
"
SYNTAX Integer32 (1..4094 | 4095)
Any comments?
Bert
_______________________________________________
Bridge-mib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib