RE: VlanID and VlanIDOrAny

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.bridge
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F038A9A8A@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
So, I guess that the IPCDN people do not need 4095. 

Otherwise, it looks OK to me. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 07 September, 2003 10:29 AM
> To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
> 
> 
> It seems that in IPCDN, some people would like
> to see yet another TC, namely:
> 
>     VlanIdOrZero      ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
>         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>         STATUS        current
>         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
> 
>                       The value zero is NOT a valid VLAN ID. 
>                       
>                       When this textual convention is used as the
>                       syntax of an object, the object definition
>                       MUST specify in the DESCRIPTION clause what
>                       the value zero means.
>                      "
>         SYNTAX        Integer32 (0 | 1..4094)
> 
> Does anyone see a problem with that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bert 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2003 0:48
> To: Bridge-Mib (E-mail)
> Subject: [Bridge-mib] VlanID and VlanIDOrAny
> 
> 
> So... nobody has reacted to my request for
> writeup. So I am preparing to do an ID myself.
> 
> This is what I think the discussion boiled down to.
> 
>     VlanId            ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
>         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>         STATUS        current
>         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN."
>         SYNTAX        Integer32 (1..4094)
> 
> 
>     VlanIdOrAny       ::= TEXTUAL CONVENTION
>         DISPLAY-HINT "d"
>         STATUS        current
>         DESCRIPTION  "The VLAN ID that uniquely identifies a VLAN.
>                       The value of 4095 is used to indicate a 
> wildcard,
>                       i.e. any value.
>                      "
>         SYNTAX        Integer32 (1..4094 | 4095)
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Bert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bridge-mib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge-mib
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.